< March 2003 >
Mar 24th: nntp//rss 0.3 hits the street. A new release of my favourite newsreader has hit the streets. The latest release implements a number of improvements over the previous builds. One of the main highlights includes support for setting individual polling intervals, this was really useful for me as some of my feeds were timing out on the connection when nntp//rss tried to retrieve them at the same time. I can now carefully stagger them to balance the load somewhat and resolve some timeout issues I had.
The big feature improvement though is the support of various blogging API's to allow items to be posted to the weblog from the newsreader. Some people think this is a bit of an overkill, but I think it is quite cool. Here's an extract from the release:
Posting - You can now post entries to your blog from within your newsreader. nntp//rss has support for the popular Blogger, LiveJournal and MetaWeblog APIs.
The next logical step would be integrating some kind of commenting integration. a link to the comments for an article is already included in the aggregated content, what I am thinking of though is the kind of integration where I can just reply to a post from my news reader. Is this possible? Well I don't know how the API's Jason Broome listed currently work, but at least one weblog I read implements the commentAPI developed by Joe Gregorio, creator of my previous favourite newsreader Aggie.
Well at least I have identified some reading to do in the future, the weblogging API's. I'll post links to them here so I know where to look when I get the time.
Further Reading:
Mar 20th: Content delivery using XML. Having read Jay Small's recent discussion of user interactivity on news websites I had one of those moments when you just think to yourself, "Yes, this is how it is supposed to work". The prompting for this wasn't solely the content of the newsletter, but some of the thoughts I had related to the article.
The article talked about message boards and how they resembled Usenet. For those who aren't initiated Usenet is alive and kicking, in fact it is possible to integrate message boards with Usenet to great effect. One of the best examples I have seen of this is on the alioth.net website. This is a fansite for the classic Elite series of games with a very active message/bulletin board. I haven't visited this site for months, but it provides an interface that suits my needs and still lets me interact with the content and with other users. I like using my newsgroup reading software, Outlook Express (Mozilla Mail still hasn't converted me), and being able to get what I want delivered the way I want it is the key to my interaction with that particular site.
This prompted another thought, RSS is another means of doing this. I use the nntp//rss news aggregator to read my favourite weblogs with all my other newsgroups. I guess this is one of the benefits of XML, delivering content to the user and letting them consume it in the way that best suits them. What better branding is there than serving a customer well?
Miscellaneous. I have been busy these last few days, a couple of pointers for you, the Feedster RSS search engine, despite not including <content:encoded> data in the search results as a replacment for the <description> element it's pretty cool. I've also created a Mozilla/Netscape search plugin for Feedster.
Mar 16th: Yahoo marking competition as Spam. Recently while setting up someone to use Windows Messenger I came across something interesting. Yahoo's spam mail filters deliver Microsoft's request for confirmation e-mail to the bulk mail folder. Yahoo competes with Microsoft in the instant messenger market with their Yahoo Messenger application. Throwing vital information from a competitor into the bulk mail folder is something that should be carefully looked at. This caused me a delay in performing the sign up for this person as I assumed the mail was delayed in internet traffic somewhere, it wasn't until several hours later when I checked again that I found the mail still wasn't in the inbox, this e-mail was delivered to the bulk mail folder.
This post is not saying that Yahoo is engaged in a conspiracy to cause problems to its e-mail users who try to signup with alternate instant messenger providers, however it is an issue which Yahoo should treat carefully, if people feel Yahoo is attempting to restrict them and coerce them into using their products then Yahoo's public image will be damaged. Something similar has happened with all the anti-trust issues surrounding Microsoft, in the eyes of many people Microsoft is not a corporation they "trust", Yahoo should be careful that they don't follow Microsoft down that road.
Related Links: (Partial) Screenshot of the Microsoft passport e-mail (used with windows messenger service) in the Yahoo bulk mail folder. A previous weblog entry on Hotmail shutting out the (then) latest Mozilla browser.
Mar 14th: Mozilla has "rich editing" in latest release. Mozilla version 1.3 has been released, this is the first stable version to include the Midas rich editing component. This brings the editing functionality of the Mozilla Composer and embeds it in a web page. Internet Explorer has had this functionality for a while, however like the Mozilla implementation the standard of the HTML generated is not optimal. This is an encouraging step for Mozilla to take, as this feature is refined and produces better HTML adoption as the front end of some open source publishing systems is likely to happen at a reasonable pace.
Love that splash screen. Yes mozilla has replaced its little dragon image with a solid orange splash screen, lovely. If on the other hand you prefer a nicer splash screen simply create a bitmap image file, call it "mozilla.bmp" and place it in the same directory as the Mozilla application.
Here's one I prepared earlier:
(provided in jpeg format, remember to convert it to a bitmap)
My original splash screens for the Mozilla 1.0 release, which this latest splash is based on, are available in my weblog archives.
Mar 3rd: Longhorn Vs RDF. Microsoft's successor to Windows XP, Longhorn, is set to promote a new file system that advances on the hierarchical paradigm that is common in contemporary operating systems. Built upon a database system, users will have a much more flexible interface to use when searching for information. This information is of course already known and has been reported on, however what I find interesting are some of the potential use cases for this system.
One reported use case, searching for specific digital photographs:
You don't want to search by file name, because they're all called dsc035.jpg. You want to search,
- show me the pictures I took last month,
- show me the pictures of me and my wife,
- show me the pictures of my children,
- show me the pictures from Christmases.
To do that requires a change both in our user interface and also a change in our model for how information is stored on the computer.
Retrieval of complex data sets is an interesting problem area, what struck me though as I came upon this topic was how similar the use cases are compared with contemporary systems using RDF as the metadata "container". FOAF for example has explored topics such as attaching metadata to photographs for example, the co-depiction photo metadata experiment for example has spawned tools which can answer a range of queries:
- Get me all image of person X,
- Get me all the images of person X that also have person Y in them,
- Order me a Hawaiian Pizza with... (sorry, slipped in from an article about internet connected fridges)
The point is that there is a lot of interesting applications for RDF, and its vocabularies, that could in many ways be even more innovative than Microsoft's current plans, especially if it is hooked up to a nice XML database that can deal with semi-structured data much more effectively than an SQL based system.
More innovative? Sure, the Microsoft paradigm is quite interesting, but the extensibility inherent in RDF allows for many more potential uses, as well as tight integration with internet based data. Microsoft are still fundamentally distanced, on a file system level, from the internet and from integration with other operating systems, whereas RDF is an established standard that can be deployed widely on both personal machines and over networks.
UI Problems Microsoft isn't going to be persuading non-gee ks to learn SQL anytime soon, the UI is an important tool in leveraging all this metadata we want to query. How is it going to be done on the RDF end? A natural language interface perhaps, or graphical exploration as demonstrated by FOAFNaut? As the amount of information we produce and consume increases at an ever increasing rate it needs to be tackled, you should see the size of the "My Pictures" folder of my PC since I bought a digital camera!
Further Reading:
[provided by Amazon.com]
- XML Databases and the Semantic Web, Bhavani Thuraisingham
- Practical RDF, Ray Lischner, Shelley Powers, Simon St. Laurent
- Professional XML Meta Data, David Dodds et al.